PERFORMANCE LOSS RATE ETIMATION IN PHOTOVOLTAICS / TURGUT KARAHÜSEYİN; SUPERVISOR: SERKAN ABBASYOĞLU

Yazar: Katkıda bulunan(lar):Dil: İngilizce 2022Tanım: 126 sheets; 31 cm. Includes CDİçerik türü:
  • text
Ortam türü:
  • unmediated
Taşıyıcı türü:
  • volume
Konu(lar): Tez notu: Thesis (PhD) - Cyprus International University. Institute of Graduate Studies and Research Energy Systems Engineering Department Özet: ABSTRACT The evolution from fossil fuel sources to environmentally friendly and sustainable energy sources is one of the critical aspects of the energy transition goal. Solar Photovoltaic power plants have been leading these sources globally since 2020 as recent developments in photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturing increased the efficiency and reduced the PV module prices. Thus, significantly lowering the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). The optimal operation of PV plants and performance loss rate (PLR) of PV plants are decisive in levelized cost of electricity. Accurate estimation of these factors will provide precise performance guarantees and reduce investment risks. The general data pipeline consists of aggregation period, filtering, normalized metric and statistical approaches used for PLR determination. In-plane irradiation and module temperature are required for the normalization of measured power output; however, these measurements are often not available for PV systems. Therefore, this work proposes a general methodology to analyze PLRs by modelling in-plane irradiation and module temperature applicable for systems with various orientations and tilt angles using data from the closest meteorological station. Furthermore, modelled and measured in-plane irradiation shows variations, especially under cloudy winter conditions, due to the distance between the analyzed site and the meteorological station. Owing to this, a diligent filtering approach is also presented in this study to eliminate miss represented data in modelled parameters due to meteorological conditions. In addition, a case study was carried out with the proposed methodology to determine the PLR of PV installation with a total installed capacity of 1045.32 kWp. Statistical approaches, seasonal and trend decomposition using locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (STL), classical seasonal decomposition (CSD) and year-on-year (YOY) methods coupled with various performance metrics, namely performance ratio (PR), temperature corrected performance ratio (TCPR), and weather corrected performance ratio suggested by National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NRELPR) for performing PLR analysis. As a result, it is found that PLRs of analysed venues, Arazi, Arena and Stonite, with the YOY approach are -1.2%/year, -0.73%/year and -2.65%/year, respectively. Furthermore, the STL method demonstrated PLRs of -0.69%/year, - 0.65%/year and -2.91%/year, respectively. On the other hand, the CSD method generated positive PLRs for some inverters. At the same time, the aforementioned statistical approaches proposed PLRs close to -2%/year due to 12 months centred moving average, making the CSD method inappropriate to be used under heavy soiling environments. Keywords: Filtering, PLR, STL, YOY
Materyal türü: Thesis
Mevcut
Materyal türü Geçerli Kütüphane Koleksiyon Yer Numarası Durum Notlar İade tarihi Barkod Materyal Ayırtmaları
Thesis Thesis CIU LIBRARY Tez Koleksiyonu Tez Koleksiyonu D 346 K27 2022 (Rafa gözat(Aşağıda açılır)) Kullanılabilir Energy Systems Engineering Department T3071
Suppl. CD Suppl. CD CIU LIBRARY Görsel İşitsel D 346 K27 2022 (Rafa gözat(Aşağıda açılır)) Kullanılabilir Energy Systems Engineering Department CDT3071
Toplam ayırtılanlar: 0

Thesis (PhD) - Cyprus International University. Institute of Graduate Studies and Research Energy Systems Engineering Department

Includes bibliography (sheets 99-117)

ABSTRACT
The evolution from fossil fuel sources to environmentally friendly and sustainable
energy sources is one of the critical aspects of the energy transition goal. Solar
Photovoltaic power plants have been leading these sources globally since 2020 as
recent developments in photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturing increased the
efficiency and reduced the PV module prices. Thus, significantly lowering the
levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). The optimal operation of PV plants and
performance loss rate (PLR) of PV plants are decisive in levelized cost of electricity.
Accurate estimation of these factors will provide precise performance guarantees and
reduce investment risks.
The general data pipeline consists of aggregation period, filtering, normalized metric
and statistical approaches used for PLR determination. In-plane irradiation and module
temperature are required for the normalization of measured power output; however,
these measurements are often not available for PV systems. Therefore, this work
proposes a general methodology to analyze PLRs by modelling in-plane irradiation
and module temperature applicable for systems with various orientations and tilt
angles using data from the closest meteorological station.
Furthermore, modelled and measured in-plane irradiation shows variations, especially
under cloudy winter conditions, due to the distance between the analyzed site and the
meteorological station. Owing to this, a diligent filtering approach is also presented in
this study to eliminate miss represented data in modelled parameters due to
meteorological conditions.
In addition, a case study was carried out with the proposed methodology to determine
the PLR of PV installation with a total installed capacity of 1045.32 kWp. Statistical
approaches, seasonal and trend decomposition using locally weighted scatterplot
smoothing (STL), classical seasonal decomposition (CSD) and year-on-year (YOY)
methods coupled with various performance metrics, namely performance ratio (PR),
temperature corrected performance ratio (TCPR), and weather corrected performance
ratio suggested by National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NRELPR) for performing
PLR analysis. As a result, it is found that PLRs of analysed venues, Arazi, Arena and
Stonite, with the YOY approach are -1.2%/year, -0.73%/year and -2.65%/year,
respectively. Furthermore, the STL method demonstrated PLRs of -0.69%/year, -
0.65%/year and -2.91%/year, respectively. On the other hand, the CSD method
generated positive PLRs for some inverters. At the same time, the aforementioned
statistical approaches proposed PLRs close to -2%/year due to 12 months centred
moving average, making the CSD method inappropriate to be used under heavy soiling
environments.
Keywords: Filtering, PLR, STL, YOY

Araştırmaya Başlarken  
  Sıkça Sorulan Sorular