TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY TOWARD CYPRUS / AYA HUSSEIN ELAMIN ELFADIL; SUPERVISOR: ASSOC. PROF. DR. SERTAÇ SONAN

Yazar: Katkıda bulunan(lar):Dil: İngilizce 2023Tanım: vii,70 sheets; 31 cm. Includes CDİçerik türü:
  • text
Ortam türü:
  • unmediated
Taşıyıcı türü:
  • volume
Konu(lar): Tez notu: Thesis (MA) - Cyprus International University. Institute of Graduate Studies and Research International Relations Department Özet: ABSTRACT Cyprus has been divided since 1974, and despite numerous efforts to reunite it, no solution has yet been reached, and the rift is increasing. In light of failed negotiations and the transformation of Turkish foreign policy, this study aims to analyse Türkiye’s position in Cyprus under the rule of the Justice and Development Party, precisely its reversal toward supporting a two-state solution in 2021. In 2002, after to coming to power, the AKP supported a bizonal, bicommunal federal solution per the Annan plan, albeit rejected. Nonetheless, following the collapse of Crans-Montana talks in 2017, Ankara proposed a two-state solution, officially asserted in 2021. Accordingly, this study aims to answer the following question: why did Türkiye abandon its support for a federal solution to the Cyprus issue? The Justice and Development Party shifted its position in Cyprus due to a broader shift in Turkish foreign policy due to emerging anti-Westernism and a pro-nationalist orientation – demonstrated by the AKP-MHP coalition – following the 2016 coup attempt. Finally, the 2021 policy shift was influenced by a geopolitical dimension brought about by the balance of power rivalry in the eastern Mediterranean region, affecting Türkiye’s perceptions of Cyprus and the region. Keywords: AKP, Energy Geopolitics, Federation, Turkish Foreign Policy, Two-state
Materyal türü: Thesis

Thesis (MA) - Cyprus International University. Institute of Graduate Studies and Research International Relations Department

Includes bibliography (sheets 55-54)

ABSTRACT
Cyprus has been divided since 1974, and despite numerous efforts to reunite it, no
solution has yet been reached, and the rift is increasing. In light of failed negotiations
and the transformation of Turkish foreign policy, this study aims to analyse Türkiye’s
position in Cyprus under the rule of the Justice and Development Party, precisely its
reversal toward supporting a two-state solution in 2021. In 2002, after to coming to
power, the AKP supported a bizonal, bicommunal federal solution per the Annan plan,
albeit rejected. Nonetheless, following the collapse of Crans-Montana talks in 2017,
Ankara proposed a two-state solution, officially asserted in 2021. Accordingly, this
study aims to answer the following question: why did Türkiye abandon its support for
a federal solution to the Cyprus issue? The Justice and Development Party shifted its
position in Cyprus due to a broader shift in Turkish foreign policy due to emerging
anti-Westernism and a pro-nationalist orientation – demonstrated by the AKP-MHP
coalition – following the 2016 coup attempt. Finally, the 2021 policy shift was
influenced by a geopolitical dimension brought about by the balance of power rivalry
in the eastern Mediterranean region, affecting Türkiye’s perceptions of Cyprus and the
region.
Keywords: AKP, Energy Geopolitics, Federation, Turkish Foreign Policy, Two-state

Araştırmaya Başlarken  
  Sıkça Sorulan Sorular