Thesis (MSc) - Cyprus International University. Institute of Graduate Studies and Research Civil Engineering Department

Includes References (sheets 64-68)

ABSTRACT
The construction industry has seen quite a spectacular transformation. To improve the
living environment, engineers are always seeking compliance for the users of its
infrastructures so that people feel safe and enjoy their properties. With the evolution
of science and technology, recently another type of house construction is in sight; it is
the construction of modular house.
Having a house that meets personal criteria remains a challenge and a dream for
everyone. This study aims to compare modular house with conventional reinforced
concrete house through, the bill of quantities, considering the work planning schedule
used by Ms Project and construction cost.
The construction cost was carried out to know which of these constructions is more
expensive. It was done through a bill of quantities calculation and unit prices. The
work planning schedule was performed to compare, which is the most favorable in
terms of duration and task management. On the cost and duration of construction, the
modular house is a good choice, despite the fact that it has a high risk of damage during
transport to the site. The conventional house, despite its cost, duration of construction,
and high demand for resources materials, and humans, is an advantageous investment
since it is, more durable, more aesthetically pleasing, and many factors.
Keywords: bill of quantities, conventional house, cost-benefit analysis, modular house,
prefabrication.