AU  - Yılmaz, Yılmaz
AU  - Supervisor: Ghafoor, Abdul 
TI  - The impact of the February 2001 crisis on the health sector a comparison between public and private hospitals in Istanbul 
PY  - 2002///
CY  - Nicosia
PB  - Cyprus International University
KW  - Management
KW  - Yönetim
KW  - Health sector
KW  - Sağlık sektörü
N1  - Includes appendix(79 - 80 p.); Includes references (76 - 78 p.); CHAPTER 1; 2; INTRODUCTION; 2; BACKGROUND; 2; OBJECTIVE OF STUDY; 2; STRUCTURE OF DISSERTATION; CHAPTER II; 4; MANAGEMENT : BASIC CONCEPTS; 5; CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING; 5; DEFINITIONS OF MANAGEMENT; 8; CONTEMPORARY DEFINITION OF MANAGEMENT; 9; FAYOL'S GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT RELATED TO ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE; 10; PROPERTIES OF WEBER'S BUREAUCRACY; 10; SUPPORTING CONCEPTS; 11; THE ROLE OF MANAGEMENT; 12; THE UNIVERSITY OF MANAGEMENT; 12; CLARIFYING JOB ACTIVITIES IN MANAGEMENT; 13; NATURE OF MANAGEMENT; 14; THE CLASSIFICATIONS OF THE FUNCTIONS OF THE MANAGEMENT; 14; BATTY'S CLASSIFICATION; 14; FORECASTING; 15; PLANNING; 16; ORGANIZING; 16; MOTIVATING; 17; CO-ORDINATING; 17; CONTROLLING; 18; LEADERSHIP; 18; DECISION-MAKING; 20; LOUIS E.BOONE AND DAVID L. KURTZ'S CLASSIFICATION; 21; LYMAN A. KEITH AND CARLO E. GUBELLIN'S CLASSIFICATION; 21; LEVEL'S OF MANAGEMENT; 21; TOP MANAGEMENT; 22; SUPERVISORY MANAGEMENT; 22; MIDDLE MANAGEMENT; 22; RESPONSIBILITIES OF A MANAGERS; 24; CRITICISMS ON MULTIFACETED MANAGER; 25; FUNCTIONS OF MANAGERS; 26; ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES OF GOOD MANAGEMENT; 26; RESPONSIBILITIES OF MANAGEMENT BOARD; 27; SKILLS NEEDED FOR EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT; 27; TECHNICAL SKILLS; 27; INTERPERSONAL SKILLS; 27; CONCEPTUAL SKILLS; 27; CONDENSATION OF THE 14 POINTS FOR MANAGEMENT; 29; MANAGEMENT  PRINCIPLE; 31; TODAY'S MANAGER; CHAPTER 3; 32; CRISIS; 33; DEFINITION OF A CRISIS; 34; REASONS OF CRISIS; 34; EXTERNAL CHANGES; 35; MANAGEMENT ERRORS; 37; CRISIS MANAGEMENT; 37; CRISIS MANAGEMENT STEPS; 38; MITIGATION; 38; PREPAREDNESS; 38; RESPONSE; 38; RECOVERY; 38; CRISIS MANAGEMENT  PLANNING; 39; COMPLIANCE; 42; PREPAREDNESS; 43; TRAINING AND RETRAINING; 44; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; 45; CRISIS MANAGEMENT TEAMS; 46; THE CRISIS MANAGER; CHAPTER 4; 48; THE PLACE OF HEALTH SECTOR IN TURKISH ECONOMY; 49; GROSS FIXED INVESTMENT; 50; SELECTIVE PHYSICAL INDICATORS; 51; HUMAN RESOURCES IN HEALTH SECTOR; 52; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INVESTMENT; 53; SHARE OF HEALTH FACILITIES AT ISTANBUL; CHAPTER 5; 57; HEALTH SECTOR BEFORE AND AFTER CRISIS : A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; 58; THE AIM AND CONTENT OF THE RESEARCH; 58; THE METHOD USED IN THE RESEARCH; 59; RESULTS AND DISCUSSION; 59; THE GENERAL ANALYSIS OF THE HOSPITALS; 59; THE CAPITAL STRUCTURE OF THE HOSPITAL; 59; THE FACILITIES AVAILABLE OF THE HOSPITAL; 60; THE NUMBER OF PERSONNEL OF HOSPITALS; 61; THE ACTUAL CAPACITY USAGE; 62; MANAGEMENT  STRUCTURE OF THE HOSPITALS BEFORE CRISIS; 62; OBJECTIVES OF THE HOSPITALS; 62; TYPES OF PLANNING OF THE HOSPITALS; 63; DISTRIBUTION OF THE HOSPITALS IN CASE OF A HAVING CRISIS GUIDE; 63; CONTENT OF THE CRISIS GUIDE; 63; TECHNIQUES USED IN THE PERCRISIS AND IN-CRISIS DECISION; 64; PROPERTIES OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE HOSPITALS; 66; PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF HOSPITAL MANAGERS; 66; TYPES OF TRAINING METHODS USED IN HOSPITALS; 67; ANALYSIS OF HOSPITALS DURING CRISIS; 67; ADDITIONAL REASONS FOR THE CRISIS IN THE HOSPITAL; 68; PRECAUTIONS TAKEN IN ORDER TO GET OUT OF CRISIS IN THE HOSPITALS; 69; NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF THE CRISIS IN THE HOSPITALS; 70; PRACTICES OF THE HOSPITALS IN THE CRISIS; 70; PERSONNEL POLICY PRACTICED DURING THE CRISIS; 70; DISTRIBUTION OF THE HOSPITALS IN CASE OF THE MANAGEMENT  STYLES; 71; DISTRIBUTION OF THE HOSPITALS IN CASE OF THE PRACTICES DURING THE CRISIS; 71; DISTRIBUTION  OF THE HOSPITALS IN CASE OF POST CRISIS PRACTICES; CHAPTER 6; 72; CONCLUSIONS; 76; REFERENCES; 79; APPENDIX :THE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
N2  - '          Although, all economical sectors were affected by the recent February 2001 economical crisis in Turkey, a health sector was hit more seriously. This study analyzes the effects of the recent economical crisis on the health sector particularly in Istanbul Region. In order to analyze the effects of the economical crisis on the health sectors, seven hospitals are chosen in Istanbul. Three of these hospitals are state and four of them are private. A Questionnaire   has prepared to collect the relevant data in explaining the effects of the economic crisis in the contest of before and after situation. The questionnaire was consist of specific and direct questions, and an interview method is used to avoid any confusion.           A comparative analysis has been used to analyze the effects of the crisis on the health sector, and to understand the differences between state and private hospitals. The results indicate that private hospitals were affected more than state hospitals. The number of patients decreases in the private hospitals while it increases in the state hospitals. The study revealed also that both kinds of hospitals were not exactly ready for any crisis.  '
ER  -