000			02439nam a22002657a 4500
003			KOHA
005			20240219154812.0
008			240219d2024 cy o|||| m||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aCY-NiCIU _beng _cCY-NiCIU _erda
041			_aeng
090			_aYL 3202 _bD56 2024
100	1		_aDjonseu, Linus Loique Siakam
245	1	0	_aCOMPARISON BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL HOUSE AND MODULAR HOUSE / _cLINUS LOIQUE SIAKAM DJONSEU; SUPERVISOR: PROF. DR. TAHIR ÇELIK
264			_c2024
300			_ax, 68 sheets: _bphotos;
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
502			_aThesis (MSc) - Cyprus International University. Institute of Graduate Studies and Research Civil Engineering Department
504			_aIncludes References (sheets 64-68)
520			_aABSTRACT The construction industry has seen quite a spectacular transformation. To improve the living environment, engineers are always seeking compliance for the users of its infrastructures so that people feel safe and enjoy their properties. With the evolution of science and technology, recently another type of house construction is in sight; it is the construction of modular house. Having a house that meets personal criteria remains a challenge and a dream for everyone. This study aims to compare modular house with conventional reinforced concrete house through, the bill of quantities, considering the work planning schedule used by Ms Project and construction cost. The construction cost was carried out to know which of these constructions is more expensive. It was done through a bill of quantities calculation and unit prices. The work planning schedule was performed to compare, which is the most favorable in terms of duration and task management. On the cost and duration of construction, the modular house is a good choice, despite the fact that it has a high risk of damage during transport to the site. The conventional house, despite its cost, duration of construction, and high demand for resources materials, and humans, is an advantageous investment since it is, more durable, more aesthetically pleasing, and many factors. Keywords: bill of quantities, conventional house, cost-benefit analysis, modular house, prefabrication.
650		0	_aCivil Engineering _vDissertations, Academic
700	1		_aÇelik, Tahir _esupervisor
942			_2ddc _cTS
999			_c292205 _d292205