000 11609na a2200985 4500
001 62302
003 koha_MIRAKIL
005 20221103133847.0
008 180313b tu 000 0
040 _aCY-NiCIU
_btur
_cCY-NiCIU
_erda
041 _aeng
090 _aYL 260
_b T26 2011
100 _aTanrıverdi, Sibel
_d1985-
245 _aThe effect of teacher immediacy behaviors on students' motivation and attitude towards language learning
_cSibel Tanrıverdi; Supervisor: Mehmet Ali Yavuz
260 _aNicosia
_bCyprus International University
_c2011
300 _aXI, 96 p.
_btable
_c30.5 cm
336 _2rdacontent
_atext
_btxt
337 _2rdamedia
_aunmediated
_bn
338 _2rdacarrier
_avolume
_bnc
504 _aIncludes appendices (84-95 p.)
504 _aIncludes references (77-83 p.)
520 _a'ABSTRACT This study sought to reveal the efficacy of teacher immediacy behaviors on students' motivation and attitude towards language learning according to the gender, level, region and the high school of the students. The sample of the study consisted of the students who studying at the Preparatory Department of Foreign Language School, Cyprus International University. In order to answer the research questions, three questionnaires were administered to the participants; Teacher Immediacy Behaviors Questionnaire, Student Motivation Questionnaire and Student Attitude towards Language Learning Questionnaire. According to the student perception of teacher immediacy scores, the participants were divided into two groups as group 1 who had lower scores and group 2 who had higher scores. Of 221 students, 61 were female and 80 were male. The questionnaires were administered at the end of the lesson without informing the learners and the instructors about the questionnaire to obtain more authentic results. During the administration of the questionnaires, the instructors had left the classroom. Then; the students were informed about it. After the course instructors had left the classroom, the students were informed about the administration of the questionnaires. SPSS 17, 0 was used so as to get the statistical results. T test and ANOVA were used to get the results. The findings revealed that there was a significant difference between the motivation scores of the students with the lower immediacy perception (group 1) and those of the students with the higher immediacy perception scores (group 2) and there is a significant difference between the female and the male students' motivation scores in group 1 and group 2, both male and female students were influenced positively from teacher immediacy behaviors were compared according to the English level, region and high school types, no significant difference was found. The findings also revealed that there was a significant difference between the language attitude scores of the students with the lower immediacy perception scores (group 1 ) and those of the students with the higher immediacy perception scores and while there is no significant difference between the language attitude scores of the students with the lower immediacy perception scores (group 1 ) and those of the students with the higher immediacy scores (group 2) according to the female students, there is significant difference according to the male students. On the other hand, there is no significant difference between the scores of the female students' attitudes toward language learning and their perception of teacher immediacy behaviors. There is a significant difference between the scores of the male students' attitudes towards language learning and their perception of teacher immediacy. There was also no significant difference according to English level, region and high school types when the student perceptions of the teacher immediacy behaviors were compared. Key Words: Teacher Immediacy, Nonverbal Teacher Immediacy, Verbal Teacher Immediacy, Motivation. ÖZET Bu araştırma, ünıverite öğrencilerin öğretmen yakınlık davranışına ilişkin algılarının, öğrencilerin cinsşyet İngilizce seviyesi, yaşadığı bölge ve mezun olduğu lise türü değişkenlerine göre, güdü ve dil tutumuna etkisini incelemektedir. Araştırmanın örneklemi, Uluslararası Kıbrıs Ünıversitesi Yabancı Diller Yüksek Okulu Hazırlık Bölümü'dür. Araştırma sorularına cevap bulabilmek ıçin, " Üniversite Öğrencilerine Yönelik Öğretmen Ykınlığı Anketi" ve "Üniversite Öğrencelirinin Yabancı Dil Öğrenmeye Tutumu" isimli üç anket kullanılmıştır. Öğretmen yakınlığı algıları sonuçlarına göre öğrenciler, yüksek puan alanlar (group 2) ve düşük puan (group 1) alanlar olmak üzere 141 öğrencinin sonuçları kullanılmıştır. Daha sağlıklı sonuç alabilmek için anketler, ders sonunda, öğrencilere ve öğretmenlere önceden haber verilmeksizin uygulanmıştır. Ders veren öğretmenler dersten çıktıktan sonra, öğrencilere anket konusunda gerekli bilgi verilmiş ve anket uygulanmıştır. ( İngilizce metni de buna göre düzenliyelim. İstatistik sonuçlara ulaşmak için, T Test ve ANOVA, SPSS 17.00 programı kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, öğretmen yakınlık algısı yüksek olan ve düşük olan öğrencilerin, güdülenmelerinde anlamlı bir fark olduğunu göstermektedir. Her iki gruptaki bay ve bayan öğrencilerin güdülenme düzeylerinde anlamlı bir fark saptanmıştır. Bu, bay ve bayan öğrencilerin öğretmen yakınlık davranışlarından olumlu etkilendiklerini göstermektdedir. Ancak, öğrencilerin öğretmen yakınlık algısı sonuçları, İngilizce seviyeleri, yaşadıkları bölge ve mezun oldukları lise türüne göre incelendiğinde, anlamlı bir fark görülmemiştir. Sonuçlar ayrıca, öğretmen yakınlık algısı yüksek olan ve düşük olan öğrencilerin, dil tutumlarında anlamlı bir fark olduğunu göstermektedir. Diğer kayda değer bir sonuç ise, 1. ve 2. Gruptaki bayan öğrencilerin öğretmen yakınlık algısı ile dil tutumu arasında anlamlı bir fark çikmazken, erkek öğrencilerinin öğretmen yakınlık algısı ile dil tutumu arasında anlamlı bir fark çikmasıdır. Bu sonuçların yanısıra, öğrencilerin öğretmen yakınlık algısı ile dil tutumları arasında, İngilizce düzeyleri, yaşadıkları bölge ve mezun oldukları lise türü incelendiğinde, anlamlı bir fark çıkmamıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Öğretmen Yakınlığı, Sözlü Öğretmen Yakınlığı, Sözsüz Öğretmen Yakınlığı, Motivasyon. '
650 _aTeacher immediacy
650 _aÖğretmen yakınlığı
650 _aVerbal Teacher immediacy
650 _aSözlü öğretmen yakınlığı
700 _aSupervisor: Yavuz, Mehmet Ali
_91656
942 _2ddc
_cTS
505 1 _tCHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
505 1 _g1
_tIntroduction
505 1 _g1
_tBackground of the Study
505 1 _g2
_tPurpose of the Study
505 1 _g3
_tResearch Questions
505 1 _g3
_tSignificance of the Study
505 1 _g4
_tAssumption of the Study
505 1 _g4
_tLimitations of the Study
505 1 _g5
_tDefinitions
505 1 _g5
_tOrganization of the Thesis
505 1 _tCHAPTER TWO: TEACHER IMMEDIACY AND MOTIVATION
505 1 _g6
_tIntroduction
505 1 _g6
_tTeacher Immediacy
505 1 _g13
_tVerbal-Nonverbal Immediacy
505 1 _g17
_tImmediacy ın the Classroom
505 1 _g18
_tRelationships between Immediacy and other Classroom Variables
505 1 _g20
_tStudent Motivation
505 1 _g21
_tTypes of Motivation
505 1 _g28
_tMotivation in the Classroom
505 1 _g30
_tThe Studeis on Teacher Immediacy Behaviors
505 1 _g38
_tThe Relationship between Immediacy and Motivation
505 1 _g40
_tSummary of the Chapter
505 1 _tCHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY
505 1 _g41
_tIntroduction
505 1 _g41
_tThe Research Design and the Objectives
505 1 _g43
_tResearch Questions
505 1 _g44
_tParticipants and the Setting of the Study
505 1 _g44
_tMaterials and Procedure
505 1 _g45
_tData and Analysis
505 1 _g46
_tSummary of the Chapter
505 1 _tCHAPTER FOUR: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
505 1 _g47
_tIntroduction
505 1 _g47
_tThe Frequency and Percentages of the Independent Variables
505 1 _g52
_tResearch Question 1: Is there a significant difference between the motivation scores of the students with the high immediacy perceptions (Group 2) and that of the student with the low immediacy perceptions(Group 1))
505 1 _g54
_tSub-Question 1: Is there a significant difference between the Motivation scores of the female and male students in Group 2 and between those of the female and male students in Group 1?
505 1 _g55
_tSu-Question 2: Do the Student perceptions of teacher immediacy change according to their levels of English such as starter, elementary, pre-intermediate and Intermediate?
505 1 _g57
_tSub-Question 3: Do the student perceptions of teacher immediacy change according to their regions such as Aegean, Mediterranean, Marmara, Black Sea, Central Anatoliaş
505 1 _g59
_tSub- Question 4: Do the student perceptions of teacher immediately change according to their educational background such as regular State high school, Vocational high school, Anatolian high School/Anatolian Science/Teacher High School/Super high school, Private Secondary School?
505 1 _g60
_tResearch Question 2: Is there a significant difference between the languages attitude scores (Group 2) and those of the students with lower immediacy scores (Group 1)
505 1 _g62
_tSub-Question 5: Is there a significant difference between the language attitude towards languages attitudes towards language learning of students in Group 1 and that of Group 2 according to their gender?
505 1 _g62
_tDiscussion of the Findings
505 1 _g62
_tResearch Questions 1: Is there a significant difference between the Motivation Scores of the students with the high immediacy perceptions(Group 2) and that of the students with the low immediacy perceptions (Group 1)?
505 1 _g64
_tSub-Question 1: Is there a significant difference between the motivation scores of the female and male students in Group 2 and between those of the Female and male students in Group 1?
505 1 _g64
_tSub-Question 2: Do the student perceptions of teacher immediacy change according to their levels of English such as starter, elementary, pre-intermediate, and intermediate?
505 1 _g65
_tSub-Question 4: Do the student perceptions of teacher immediacy perception scores (Group 2) and those of the students with lower immediate scores (Group 1)
505 1 _g66
_tResearch Question 2: Is there a significant difference between the language attitude scores of the students with higher immediate perception scores (Group 2) and those of the students with lower immediacy scores (Group 1)?
505 1 _g66
_tSub-Question 5: Is there a significant difference between the language attitudes towards language learning of students in Group 1 and that of Group 2 according to their gender?
505 1 _g67
_tSummary of the Chapter
505 1 _tCHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
505 1 _g68
_tIntroduction
505 1 _g68
_tConclusion
505 1 _g70
_tSuggestions
505 1 _g71
_tSummary of the Chapter
505 1 _g72
_tREFERENCES
505 1 _g79
_tAPPENDICES
999 _c322
_d322