000 06886na a2201117 4500
001 233321
003 koha_MIRAKIL
005 20221226090135.0
008 190118b tu 000 0
040 _aCY-NiCIU
_btur
_cCY-NiCIU
_erda
041 _aeng
090 _aYL 383
_bA77 2014
100 _aAqrawi, Rany Muayad Hussein
245 _aA study on deductive and inductive approaches in teaching grammar to Iraqi learners of English
_cRany Muayad Hussein Aqrawi; Supervisor: Behbud Muhammedzade
260 _aNicosia
_bCyprus International University
_c2014
300 _aVII, 99 p.
_btable
_c30.5 cm
_eCD
336 _2rdacontent
_atext
_btxt
337 _2rdamedia
_aunmediated
_bn
338 _2rdacarrier
_avolume
_bnc
500 _3Includes CD
520 _a'Abstract This study attempts to look into how effective an inductive approach is in comparison to the deductive approach in the grammer classes of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). The opinions of both the students and tutors concerning the deductive and inductive instructions in their grammar classes are also considered for advanced examination. In this study, the research methods that are applied include; interviews, experimental research and questionnaires, since they contain a mixture of research methods, which assist in collecting adequate data in order to draw a valid conclusion in this research. In the part of experimental, this study looks into the outcomes of both the deductive and inductive instruction in teaching First conditional to 64 Iraqi high school students in two distinct classes. The two clusters of participating learners are subjected to two unlike instructing methods, after which, the effectiveness of the methods are probed and a contrast is made on the achievements from the results obtained from their pre, post and delayed post-tests. In the part of the questionnaire, the opinions of the learners from the different instructional approaches are scrutinized after the treatment. Advanced semi-structured interviews are conducted to four of the English teachers in Iraq, who work for different high schools in order to examine their preference and perceptions on this subject. The results of this research show that the achievement level among the two groups do not provide a figure which is significant statistically; it implies that both methods are effective in teaching the target grammatical structure and also in term of the retention. This is supported by the sequences of comparisons that are done on different features. Additionally, learners have a preference for inductive instructions for the improvement of their instincts, although they deem to be much more appropriate for the deductive instructions, which is a secure perception. Furthermore, tutors have the same opinion that inductive teaching ought to be promoted, so as to benefit learners in the long run. Nonetheless, they have to often use deductive instruction in class because of the rigid system of education examination and curriculum. There is expectation that this research will provide a noteworthy contribution in this field of study on the way to instruct EFL classes in English grammar with much effectiveness and merge both the tutors and learner's belief to the teaching itself in the days to come.'
650 _aEnglish grammar
650 _aDil bilim
650 _aEnglish language teaching
650 _aİngilizce dili öğretimi
700 _aSupervisor: Muhammedzadeh, Behbud
_91656
942 _2ddc
_cTS
505 1 _g1
_tCHAPTER ONE
505 1 _g1
_tINTRODUCTION
505 1 _g1
_tBcakground
505 1 _g3
_tPurpose of the Study
505 1 _g3
_tRsearch Question s
505 1 _g3
_tResearch Question
505 1 _g3
_tSubresearch Questions
505 1 _g3
_tSignificance of the Study
505 1 _g4
_tThe Procedures
505 1 _g6
_tCHAPTER TWO
505 1 _g6
_tLITERATURE REVIEW
505 1 _g6
_tLanguages learning
505 1 _g6
_tWhat is Grammer?
505 1 _g7
_tHistorical Background of Grammer and Grammer Teaching
505 1 _g8
_tTheoretical Aproaches to Grammer Teaching
505 1 _g8
_tGrammer in the Grammer -translation Method
505 1 _g9
_tGrammar in the Situation Language Teaching
505 1 _g10
_tGrammar in the Audiolingual Method
505 1 _g10
_tGrammar in the Communication Language Teaching Method
505 1 _g11
_tExplicit and implicit grammar instruction
505 1 _g12
_tDefinition of Terms
505 1 _g12
_tDeductive approach
505 1 _g13
_tInductive approach
505 1 _g15
_tComparison between Deductive and İnductive approaches
505 1 _g16
_tAdvantages and Disadvantages of Deductive and Inductive approaches
505 1 _g18
_tPrevious Studies on Deductive and Inductive
505 1 _g21
_tCHAPTER THREE
505 1 _g21
_tMethdodology
505 1 _g22
_tThe present study
505 1 _g22
_tParticipants
505 1 _g23
_tInstruments
505 1 _g23
_tPre, Post and Delayed Post-Test
505 1 _g23
_tInstructional pasckets
505 1 _g23
_tQuestionnaire
505 1 _g24
_tSemi-Structured Interview
505 1 _g24
_tProcedures
505 1 _g25
_tTreatment
505 1 _g26
_tData Analysis
505 1 _g27
_tLimitations
505 1 _g28
_tCHAPTER FOUR
505 1 _g28
_tDATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS
505 1 _g28
_tThe Present Study
505 1 _g28
_tAnalysis of Data
505 1 _g28
_tThe Result of All Tests
505 1 _g29
_tThe Results of the Pre-Test
505 1 _g32
_tComparisons of the Results of the Post-Test
505 1 _g34
_tResults of the Delayed Post-Test
505 1 _g36
_tStudents' opinions on Deductive and Inductive Instruction in EFL Grammar Classes
505 1 _g37
_tThe Results of the First Question
505 1 _g38
_tThe Results of the Second Question
505 1 _g39
_tThe Results of the Third Question
505 1 _g40
_tThe Results of the Fourth Question
505 1 _g40
_tThe Results of the Fıfth Question
505 1 _g41
_tThe Results of the sixth Question
505 1 _g42
_tThe Results of the seventh Question
505 1 _g42
_tThe Results of the Eight Question
505 1 _g43
_tThe Results of the Ninth Question
505 1 _g44
_tThe Results of the Tenth Question
505 1 _g44
_tThe Results of the Tenth Question
505 1 _g45
_tThe Results of the Twelfth Question
505 1 _g46
_tTeacher's opinions on Deductive and Inductive Instruction in EFL Grammar Classes
505 1 _g47
_tDiscussion
505 1 _g48
_tCHAPTER FIVE
505 1 _g48
_tConclusion
505 1 _g48
_tRecommendation for EFL Grammer Education
505 1 _g51
_tLimitation of the Study and Future Consideration
505 1 _g53
_tBIBLIOGRAPHY
999 _c429
_d429