Sonuçlar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessing UN conflict management in the Syrian crisis (2011-2018)/ Aishat Anavberokhai Imonigie; Supervisor: Özker Kocadal by Dil: İngilizce
Yayın ayrıntıları:Nicosia: Cyprus International University, 2020
Tez notu: ABSTRACT The Arab Spring, at first seemed to be a beacon of hope for the Middle East, has become Syria‟s worst nightmare. The Syrian civil war, triggered by the uprising following the Arab Spring, is on for the past nine years, and in spite of significant international endeavors, there continues to be no obvious resolution on the horizon. The aim of this study is to evaluate the United Nations conflict management strategies in Syria. This study applies a qualitative case-study approach to obtain more in depth information of the organization‟s efforts to resolve this conflict. This study reveals that the international key players (Turkey Russia, Iran, U.S, Saudi Arabia) continues to play significant roles either supporting the regime or on the side of the opposition groups. Therefore, it could be seen that United Nations efforts to manage the Syrian conflict under three different leadership of United Nations "Staffan de Mistura, Lakhdar Brahimi and Kofi Annan" were unable to bring the Syrian conflict to an end. Under these leadership, various plans were drawn, initiative were put in place which often look promising at first instance, but the truth is, these approaches have made little to none significant impacts to bring a lasting solution to this prolonged violence. Keywords: United Nations, Syrian Crisis, the Arab Spring, Turkey, Russia, Saudi Arabia
Kullanılabilirlik: Ödünç verilebilen materyaller: CIU LIBRARY (1)Yer numarası:YL 1740 I46 2020.
|
|
|
|
|
The complexity of defining terrorism: Between terrorist and freedom fighter/ Komron Niyozov; Supervisor: Özker Kocadal by Dil: İngilizce
Yayın ayrıntıları:Nicosia: Cyprus International University, 2020
Tez notu: ABSTRACT The widely circulated claim that "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" raises the complexity to defining the concept of terrorism significantly, which has been particularly one of the major concerns for state policies and the international community in general which is in search for a better way to fight against it. In an attempt to understand the definitional difficulty, I argue that the complexity to define terrorism results from the fact that it is a social construction and that some people self-identify and that have identified as freedom fighters in their communities are turned into terrorist strategically and historically to serve state interests as exemplified by Irish Provisional Army in Northern Ireland, the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka and the Taliban in Afghanistan. Keywords: Security, Terrorism, Counterterrorism, Freedom fighters, Terrorist, Constructivism.
Kullanılabilirlik: Ödünç verilebilen materyaller: CIU LIBRARY (1)Yer numarası:YL 1698 N49 2020.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|